Ollo ha preso l'x25-m 80Gb della intel, ecco i suoi risultati con HDTUNE Pro 3.50
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/8y2be0e/1.jpg
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/jo4d70v2/2.jpg
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/rsf58fwt/3.jpg
Visualizzazione Stampabile
Ollo ha preso l'x25-m 80Gb della intel, ecco i suoi risultati con HDTUNE Pro 3.50
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/8y2be0e/1.jpg
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/jo4d70v2/2.jpg
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/rsf58fwt/3.jpg
Ecco i miei con un velociraptor da 150gb su chipset x58 (sb: ich10r, stesso di ollo credo)
http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/2...rkwdcwd150.png
http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/1...chmarkwdcw.png
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7...ccesswdcwd.png
Confrontiamoli:
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/8y2be0e/1.jpghttp://img268.imageshack.us/img268/2...rkwdcwd150.png
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/jo4d70v2/2.jpghttp://img200.imageshack.us/img200/1...chmarkwdcw.png
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/rsf58fwt/3.jpghttp://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7...ccesswdcwd.png
I tempi di accesso sono a dir poco impressionanti, il transfer rate è bello tosto, mi lascia perplesso la velocità di scrittura... :uhm:
Ollo, quando puoi, scrivi la tua config completa e prova anche gli altri test (quelli che ti ha detto spz) oltre alle tue impressioni generali!
Raid 0 di 2 velociraptor 150GB:
Il tema di Windows 7 per Vista mi sfalsa la finestra di HDTune, ma i valori si leggono ugualmente ( devo sistemarlo prima o poi :asd: ) :sisi:
http://g.imagehost.org/0550/asd.jpg
http://g.imagehost.org/0244/asd1.jpg
http://g.imagehost.org/0808/asd2.jpg
Grazie nere. grazie ollo.
Non riesco a capire quella velocità in scrittura... :uhm:
è un altro test, ma mi aspettavo qualche mega in più:
http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/sto..._scrittura.gif
e non tutti gli ssd sono lenti in scrittura...
http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/sto..._scrittura.png
Questo è un signor ssd... :schiuma:
http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/sto..._scrittura.png
Aspetto questo... :schiumafap:
Riposto un link che avevo già postato: http://forums.overclockers.com.au/sh...d.php?t=781651
spiegano le differenze, in maniera grossolana, dei vari controller:
Cmq nelle scritture sequenziali il samsung va molto meglio degli altri controller, è nelle scritture casuale che invece l'intel torna a prevalere
Addo queste reviews: http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...id=3&Itemid=60
protip per ollo: tempo addietro avevo letto qui http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/sto...vertici_5.html di un aggiornamento firmware per l'intel che aggiusta le prestazioni, nel dubbio meglio controllare... :pippotto:
Fortuna c'è sempre questo limite che mi tiene a bada...
Fonte: http://www.anandtech.com/storage/sho...px?i=3531&p=15Citazione:
The Verdict
There’s no skirting the issue: even the best SSDs lose performance the more you use them. Eventually their performance should level off but what matters the most is how their performance degrades.
In using the X25-M I’d say that the performance drop was noticeable but not a deal breaker - and the data tends to agree with me. With average write latencies still well under 1ms, the drive maintained its most important performance characteristic - the ability to perform random accesses much faster than a conventional hard drive.
Keep in mind that with the cost per GB being as high as it is, these SSDs aren’t going to be used for large file storage in a desktop or notebook. You’re far more likely to use one as your boot/applications drive. As such, what matter the most aren’t peak transfer rates but rather fast access times. On a well designed drive with a good controller, peak transfer rates may fall over time, but latency remains good.
You end up with a drive that still manages to be much faster than the fastest 3.5” hard drives, but slower than when you first got it.
If, however, you aren’t ok with the performance drop over time then it’s worth considering what your options will be. When drives ship with ATA-TRIM support, hopefully late this year, they will do a better job of staying closer to their maximum performance. But the problem won’t be solved completely. Instead, what we’ll need to see is a more fundamental architectural change to eliminate the problem.
I still believe that a SSD is the single most effective performance upgrade you can do to your PC; even while taking this behavior into account. While personally I wouldn’t give up a SSD in any of my machines, I can understand the hesitation in investing a great deal of money in one today.
Intel’s X25-M: Not So Adaptive Performance?
The Intel drive is in a constant quest to return to peak performance, that’s what its controller is designed to do. The drive is constantly cleaning as it goes along to ensure its performance is as high as possible, for as long as possible. A recent PC Perspective investigation unearthed a scenario where the X25-M is unable to recover and is stuck at a significantly lower level of performance until the drive is secure erased once more.
There’s not much I can say about the issue other than I’ve been working with Intel on it very closely and it’s not something I’m overly concerned about at this point. I can replicate the PC Perspective data but not by using my machine normally. Through the right combination of benchmarks I can effectively put the drive in a poor performance state that it won’t recover from without a secure erase. I should also mention that I can do the same to other drives as well.
I’ll be able to say more soon but for now just hang tight. I’d venture a guess that Intel would not leave its most loyal customers out in the cold after spending $400 - $800 on a SSD. I can’t speak for Intel but like I said, stay tuned.
(bellissima rece, da leggere assolutamente)
:pippotto:
Aggiornato il firmware:
Prima
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/jo4d70v2/2.jpg
dopo
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/25mz459u/bench.jpg
Un bel miglioramento direi :sisi:
E sti grancaz.zi? :asd:
Ora sono appetibilissimi anche per il sottoscritto... :pippotto:
Onestamente, noti un degrado dopo circa 2 settimane?
Saresti così gentile da fare gli altri test? :baci:
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/atxtmm3d/1.jpg
http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/u6juykd9/2.jpg
Non noto alcun decadimento delle prestazioni (installato sims3 + nokia pc suite, 10 giga liberi)
:fag:
Sono impressionato, la scimmia è al 80%. :sisi:
Cosa ti ci vuole per farla salire di un altro 20%? :asd:
Comunque sono davvero bestiali... :schiuma:
Però non sono ancora pronto psicologicamente per il grande salto...aspetto che la tecnologia maturi ancora un pò. :bua:
Te Terron o Raid0 o niente, eh... :asd:
EDIT: anche al matrimonio ce ne ha parlato un gran bene Ollo... :fag:
E non aveva ancora fatto l'aggiornamento del firmware... :fag:
Gli mancano ancora almeno 70 gb e qualche euro in meno. :sisi:
Cmq no, credo sia quasi inutile fare un raid visto le prestazioni col singolo disco!