TGM Fantanba 2016
Inizio un nuovo topic per la nuova stagione del Fantanba che anche quest'anno si svolgerà su hoops (http://basketball.sports.ws/)
La lega a cui unirsi è "TGM League 2016", la password è: "kerrisoverrate"
Per ora i partecipanti sono:
Direi di aspettare ancora qualche giorno per trovare qualcuno che si aggiunga e poi vediamo come suddividere conference\division.1) Lars89
2) MrVermont
3) Vitor
4) Sbonk
5) Squall90
6) meL
7)MrWashington
8 )Paco_06
9) Sansav_81
10) TheSgrash
11)Rei Ayanami
Per quest'anno abbiamo deciso di adottare il sistema di posizioni nuovo, che suddivide (senza doppi ruoli di default) i giocatori in point guard (gli 1), ali (i 2 e i 3) e big men (i 4 e i 5). Il sistema di minutaggio è quindi rovesciato rispetto al passato (dove i centri erano il ruolo focale, mentre ora i play puri dovrebbero essere i più ricercati): le pg devono coprire 48 minuti, mentre le ali e i big men 96 minuti ciascuno.
In questo trafiletto trovate spiegazioni più dettagliate:
La regola per proporre i voti per il cambio di ruolo è sempre la stessa: si può fare fino all'inizio del draft, una volta cominciato il draft sono vietati. E non essendoci doppi ruoli già stabiliti da hoops sarà un aspetto ancora più importanteWith the Modern Position format, we’ve taken all NBA players that play PF and C and classified them as Big Men (B for short). The new Modern Position format allots 96 Big Man minutes.Another distinction that basketball fans may have noticed is that the difference between shooting guard and small forward is a rather insignificant one as well. Here we really shake up the Traditional Format by combining NBA players that play SG with those who play SF. We call these players Wings (W for short). Fantasy leagues that choose this new Modern Position format will get 96 Wing minutes.
That leaves 48 minutes available. Whereas the Traditional Position format puts centers on a pedestal as the unique position, the Modern Position format puts Point Guards on this pedestal. Point guards, are obviously guards that don’t play the two.
The end goal of the Modern Position format is to encourage a more realistic looking roster, even if that means thrusting a relatively weak Wing position into the spotlight. With the Traditional Position format, you could thrive with a starting lineup of Chris Paul, Ricky Rubio, Anthony Davis, Tim Duncan and Greg Monroe. Such a lineup, though amazing, would never work in the NBA because there are no perimeter players that are so necessary for court spacing. Players like Gordon Hayward, Giannis Antetokounmpo and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist might not break a roster in a small Traditional league, but they’re worth consideration in Modern leagues and they add to the realism of the Sports.ws experience. Additionally, stars like Jimmy Butler and Klay Thompson become quite valuable whereas previously they didn’t hold much appeal in deep leagues.
Things To Consider:
1) There are no default hybrid positions in Modern leagues. Users can vote for hybrid positions if they would like to see a PW (perhaps somebody like Monta Ellis would thrive here). They can also vote to see a WB (perhaps somebody like Ryan Anderson). Feel free to be as strict or as generous as you like. Additionally premium Sports.ws donors with commissioner access to their leagues can customize positions however they see fit. Look into that here.
2) There is no shortage of quality big men. Whereas previously 60% of your lineup was an F or a C, now only 40% is. Keep that in mind when reaching for frontcourt players like Kyle O’Quinn in the draft, your pick may be better utilized on a winger like Shabazz Muhammad even though the FPPM is so much different (in Production Leagues, at least).
3) We wanted to roll this out in 2014-15 so that we could have all the inks ironed out before 2015-16. If you notice a weird visual glitch or even a bug in the code, let us know so that we can clean it up. On top of that, let us know what you think about our position designations. If you think somebody should be a P instead of a W or vice versa, we want to hear it.
Rispondi Citando
signor G 
Originariamente Scritto da Vitor
